Posts tagged with qualitative

Showing 11 - 20 of 39 items
A word cloud with such words as: accessibility, PDF, ADA, WCAG2.0, user experience, assistive technology, etc.
  • Bryan Birchmeier
The Accessibility Remediation Team was created to serve as a resource for students, faculty, and staff when they needed more accessible library content. Beginning in the Fall 2020 we identified tools and processes to use in remediating video, audio, and PDFs for accessibility. As part of our service, we focused on assessment, gathering feedback through ‘exit’ surveys of colleagues and patrons, and using project management tools to gauge the amount of time tasks take to complete.
Sticky note of a light bulb pinned on a cork board.
  • Autumn Wetli-Staneluis
This blog post reflects on the work of students to explore the collection-related needs of undergraduate students, through surveys and interviews.
Image of a Google impact map, depicting content requests by world location.
  • Charles Watkinson
Between March 20 and August 31, 2020, the University of Michigan Press made all the titles in the Library-hosted ebook collection, UMP EBC, free-to-read. During this period, U-M Press staff gathered use data in the hope of assessing the impact of free-to-read content while informing the future business strategy. Three different assessment efforts are described in this post.
Photo of a card sorting exercise, with 5 columns of content attached to a wall.
  • Julia Anne Maxwell
Source evaluation is an important skill in our information landscape, which is why librarians teach this concept to students during course-integrated information literacy sessions. As part of an IMLS grant, our research team is conducting a two part study to understand the impact of library instruction on students’ evaluation of sources. In this post, we discuss the use of a questionnaire and role-playing interviews to learn more about students’ confidence in their evaluation abilities.
Word cloud of interview themes, such as results relevance, filtering, record display, call number, course reserves, advanced search, Boolean queries, etc.
  • Robyn Ness
U-M Library’s Library Search launched in 2018 as a unified search engine application containing five previously distinct interfaces: Catalog, Articles, Databases, Online Journals, and Library Websites. Library Search was a big change for users, and an increase in user support requests suggested that further exploration was needed to pinpoint user pain points. The authors began an exploratory study that helped understand users’ experiences and identified areas for continued work.
Photo of wooden tiles spelling the word empathy.
  • Jasmine Mae Pawlicki
How does one get valid data without traumatizing or alienating students and faculty in a trying time? According to this author, by taking an empathetic approach to planning and implementing an assessment project, you can minimize negative impacts to your community.
Tow columns, left one labeled Seen and right one labeled Safe.
  • Denise Leyton
In three blog posts, the authors describe a multi-year library service design project. This last post describes the team’s prototyping and testing processes, and our resulting interactive exercise.
Two columns, left one labeled Seen and right one labeled Safe.
  • Denise Leyton
In three blog posts, the authors describe a multi-year library service design project. This second post describes the research process used to develop our user experience tool.
Two columns, one labeled Seen and the other labeled Safe, with a gray scale gradient.
  • Denise Leyton
In three blog posts, the authors describe a multi-year library service design project. This first post describes the origins and goals of the assessment project.
Iteration in the design thinking process: Understand, Explore, and Materialize categories, with steps of empathize, define, ideate, prototype, test, implement.
  • Karen A Reiman-Sendi
A project team charged with providing staff training activities approached the project assessment with an iterative design lens, allowing for responsive and timely development of multiple opportunities for staff engagement around organizational and personal change. The team tried out different assessment techniques related to the opportunities offered.